The Bicentenary of the arrival of the 1820 Settlers

Nottinghamshire Settlers and Locations
Magaliesberg Association Culture Heritage Logo
This year is the 200th anniversary of the arrival of the 1820 settlers, a group which laid the foundations for a permanent, distinctive, white English-speaking population in South Africa. In this piece I pay tribute to the settlers who were prepared to undertake the task of establishing new lives for themselves on a remote frontier of the Empire, and at the challenges and opportunities facing them in their new home.
To understand why the settlers came to South Africa, one has to go back to the years before 1820 and to developments that were taking place on the Eastern Cape frontier. In 1817, the Cape Governor, Lord Charles Somerset, recommended to the British government that British settlers be sent to the Eastern Cape where four wars had taken place against the Xhosa since the late eighteenth century. Somerset hoped that a compact British settlement would act as a buffer against the Xhosa.
This request arrived at a time of widespread economic dislocation and agricultural depression in Britain after the Napoleonic wars which had left many unemployed and destitute, fuelling concerns about social unrest. Accordingly, the British government was prepared to finance a scheme which was intended to establish a sturdy, self-reliant community of agriculturalists on the frontier. These would be sent out in parties, each one under a leader and consisting of indentured labourers with their families. These labourers would have to work for their party leader for three years after which each man over eighteen would receive a 40 hectare land grant.
Arriving in Algoa Bay Thoman BainesArriving in Algoa Bay, Thomas Baines
From December 1819, 4,500 settlers left Britain in 28 small cramped ships taking up to 98 days to reach the Cape. From the start, however, it was apparent that Somerset’s vision of establishing a closely-knit agricultural community to act as a buffer against Xhosa incursions had no hope of succeeding. In the first place, the land in Albany where they were to be settled was essentially grazing veld, unsuitable for productive arable farming. On top of this, less than half the settlers were agriculturalists, most being artisans, labourers, small businessmen, half-pay officers and tradesmen from Britain’s rapidly industrialising cities, men with no knowledge of farming. In addition, for the first three years the settlers were plagued by droughts, floods, rust and crop failure. It isn’t surprising that most indentured labourers broke their contracts  and abandoned the lands that had been allocated to them. Of the 1,004 male adults who came to the Cape, only 438 remained on their lands.
Albany mapOf those who left, many moved to the small towns in the interior where they revolutionised urban life, playing an important role in  commerce and public affairs. Within a generation they dominated the towns, establishing banks, schools, libraries, societies and newspapers. Others became itinerant traders and hunters, transforming the lives of rural Afrikaners and blacks who became increasingly dependent on them.
1820 trekking
For those who remained on the land, their diaries and letters paint a vivid picture of the travails they had to endure with many being reduced to a life of hardship and even poverty,. Few knew how to cope with their new lives, exhausting their strength and resources trying to turn Albany into  an agricultural settlement. The more rugged settlers from Scotland and Northern England who were used to working marginal land tended to adapt more easily than their southern counterparts who were less psychologically prepared for so different an environment. Scots were also more willing than the English to learn from Afrikaners and the Khoikhoi (Hottentots) on how to subsist off the veld and how to use the environment to advantage. On the whole it was settlers, mainly leaders of parties who accumulated large land holdings, or those who had many sons to work in the fields and herd livestock who had more of a chance of succeeding.
 Thomas BainsThomas Baines
By the mid 1820s prospects were brightening as they began to realise Albany’s grazing potential and began importing merino sheep. In the early 1830s when Port Elizabeth became a free port without import or export duties, sheep farming took off, encouraged by a rapidly escalating demand for raw wool in Britain, From Albany, sheep farmers spread into the neighbouring midland divisions while after the voortrekkers started leaving the Eastern Cape other settlers bought farms from them throughout the Eastern Cape. After Natal and the Orange River Sovereignty were annexed in the 1840s they also became sheep farmers  in those territories. In the process, the settlers exerted an influence on South African economic growth out of all proportion to their numbers. They transformed the Cape’s essentially pre-capitalist agrarian economy and opened southern Africa up economically and commercially to the wider world.
While settler achievements benefited many South Africans, they also had unfortunate consequences. A growing labour shortage saw farmers turn to the Khoikhoi for labour but they soon regarded them negatively, arguing that those living on mission stations were being ‘ruined’ by missionaries who encouraged them to place themselves on an equal footing with whites and to resist their labour demands.
The settlers’ relations with the Xhosa were more ambivalent.  Positively, the Xhosa were suppliers of goods, particularly ivory and skins, to the settlers. By the 1830s, growing trade between them was benefiting both white and black. Negatively, the newly-arrived settlers were not  aware that in the frontier wars from the late eighteenth century, the Xhosa had been driven from the lands settlers now occupied. As settler leader, John Bailie, later commented, they settled on the frontier ‘unconscious of danger, little dreaming that we sat on a powder mine, which ultimately exploded with fatal effect’. They couldn’t comprehend Xhosa grievances or appreciate the destitution; land hunger and anger they were experiencing. More seriously, they did not realise that the Xhosa were determined to regain their lands. The result was growing conflicts between the two groups with Xhosa raiding cattle, at times killing individual settlers and the latter reacting.
Xhosa Wars, Thomas BainesXhosa wars Thomas Baines
By the 1830s, as sheep farming expanded and the economy boomed, so the merchants of Grahamstown who were investing heavily in sheep, and a new generation of frontier farmers that was growing up in need of land, were turning covetous eyes east of the frontier to the luxuriant grasslands held by the Xhosa, so much so that humanitarians and missionaries in the Western Cape accused them of wanting to dispossess the Xhosa of these lands.
Growing tensions led to the Sixth Frontier War when growing Xhosa desperation  saw 20,000 warriors invade the colony in December 1834, burning settler homesteads and villages and driving off livestock. Although the Xhosa were driven back over the Great Fish River and the their lands to the Great Kei River were annexed to the colony, the British government subsequently disallowed the annexation, effectively blaming settler actions for having left the Xhosa no option but to go to war. The war and its aftermath were traumatic for the settlers  who now lived constantly afraid of being attacked and concerned about the safety of themselves, their stock and property. As settler John Mitford Bowker eloquently described their lives: ‘the anxieties – the watchings – searchings – dogs barking’. Many became embittered and hostile, seeing themselves rejected by the British government and the Cape administration and regarding the Xhosa as a cunning and dangerous enemy. In the process they were beginning to forge a frontier identity that was both separatist and racist and which saw them  emphasise their role as a civilized post on a dangerous frontier.
High Street, Grahamstown
Hight Street Grahamstown In 1844, with all that they had been through in the previous 25 years and were to experience in the future, and this included another two frontier wars between 1846 and 1852, the settlers felt that they had good reason to celebrate the settlement’s silver jubilee. Their arrival in the Eastern Cape might not have planted the closely-knit agricultural community that Lord Charles Somerset had envisioned to act as a buffer against Xhosa incursions. But what it had done was establish a self-contained British community with a cohesive and distinct identity.
A settler family 1820 Settlers National Monument
A settler family, 1820 Settlers National Monument
Many had come to love and identify with their new home and a strong sense of belonging to the Eastern Cape was beginning to evolve, particularly amongst those who remained on the land.
While retaining their British identity and loyalty, the settlers had given southern Africa  a permanent, cohesive and distinctive English-speaking population, one which was identifying itself with South Africa and, the ultimate sign of belonging, was already beginning to speak with a distinctive South African accent. They were becoming a people who were, for good and ill, to have a profound effect on South Africa’s future and on the relationships between English and Afrikaner and between white and black.

Magaliesberg Association Culture Heritage Logo

  • Hits: 796